2017 CVC Team Statistics

Rk
1 Merced 42 1505 321 464 76 18 24 286 221 298 72 21 .308 .411 .431
2 Fresno 42 1444 262 376 65 12 18 230 222 288 34 16 .260 .377 .359
3 Reedley 44 1490 256 410 56 16 17 217 180 285 29 11 .275 .370 .368
4 Taft 40 1353 221 363 63 5 15 183 162 230 46 20 .268 .362 .356
5 Cerro Coso 39 1449 330 491 92 31 12 298 155 241 22 12 .339 .417 .470
6 Sequoias 45 1566 274 437 86 6 10 233 201 228 24 14 .279 .373 .361
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 1406 277 424 83 9 8 240 171 263 62 21 .302 .392 .390
8 Porterville 40 1259 132 250 33 3 3 111 154 280 22 12 .199 .312 .237
Rk
1 Merced 42 54 20 31 648 118 32 367 381 .96 1831
2 Fresno 42 58 17 25 519 95 30 382 375 1.02 1766
3 Reedley 44 57 21 26 549 89 35 396 389 1.02 1774
4 Taft 40 43 11 27 481 83 27 421 324 1.30 1596
5 Cerro Coso 39 50 16 15 681 135 28 353 340 1.04 1685
6 Sequoias 45 46 21 33 565 102 35 432 465 .93 1867
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 54 23 25 549 100 25 344 377 .91 1679
8 Porterville 40 58 11 20 298 39 23 393 284 1.38 1502
Rk
1 Merced 42 381.1 305 188 138 166 357 8.43 8 3.26 1.24
2 Fresno 42 375.0 344 176 143 178 342 8.21 5 3.43 -
3 Reedley 44 383.0 399 224 180 155 246 5.78 19 4.23 1.45
4 Taft 40 347.1 404 261 211 177 231 5.99 16 5.47 -
5 Cerro Coso 39 331.2 434 310 258 190 276 7.49 13 7.00 -
6 Sequoias 45 407.0 444 227 182 160 331 7.32 11 4.02 1.48
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 348.1 409 319 256 260 271 7.00 15 6.61 -
8 Porterville 40 346.0 481 364 242 164 195 5.07 17 6.29 -
Rk
1 Merced 42 1671 1144 462 65 .961 30 27 21 .438 6 -
2 Fresno 42 1644 1123 474 47 .971 40 59 15 .203 16 -
3 Reedley 44 1682 1149 455 78 .954 26 28 18 .391 7 -
4 Taft 40 1516 1042 405 69 .954 26 53 10 .159 9 -
5 Cerro Coso 39 1450 994 390 66 .954 27 44 21 .323 15 1
6 Sequoias 45 1759 1221 469 69 .961 24 33 11 .250 3 -
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 1578 1045 451 82 .948 38 57 15 .208 28 -
8 Porterville 40 1432 977 348 107 .925 17 87 15 .147 41 2
Rk
1 Merced 20 0 0
2 Fresno 21 6,657 317
3 Reedley 20 2,514 126
4 Taft 21 1,365 65
5 Cerro Coso 20 1,940 97
6 Sequoias 23 0 0
7 West Hills Coalinga 17 0 0
8 Porterville 24 855 36
Rk
1 Merced 21 781 186 257 37 14 16 166 113 152 49 9 .329 .426 .474
2 Fresno 21 752 154 205 39 6 10 137 123 142 15 8 .273 .391 .380
3 Reedley 21 726 111 211 26 11 4 97 77 144 9 6 .291 .370 .373
4 Taft 21 726 120 203 33 3 6 101 91 128 18 13 .280 .374 .358
5 Cerro Coso 21 778 167 244 49 15 5 141 91 145 17 6 .314 .402 .434
5 Sequoias 21 760 145 216 47 2 5 125 101 106 9 8 .284 .377 .371
7 West Hills Coalinga 21 726 108 202 38 4 2 91 61 151 28 10 .278 .350 .350
8 Porterville 21 649 47 116 14 2 - 39 72 159 8 5 .179 .291 .206
Rk
1 Merced 21 27 11 21 370 67 19 202 179 1.13 953
2 Fresno 21 31 12 9 286 55 18 176 207 .85 927
3 Reedley 21 23 14 12 271 41 16 169 201 .84 852
4 Taft 21 22 5 15 260 42 17 230 153 1.50 859
5 Cerro Coso 21 26 4 8 338 69 16 194 174 1.11 907
5 Sequoias 21 20 13 15 282 54 14 202 236 .86 909
7 West Hills Coalinga 21 23 8 11 254 44 13 180 192 .94 829
8 Porterville 21 32 3 7 134 16 16 212 148 1.43 763
Rk
1 Merced 21 198.1 151 80 53 86 192 8.71 4 2.41 1.19
2 Fresno 21 189.0 190 93 77 83 162 7.71 3 3.67 -
3 Reedley 21 182.1 175 93 74 71 123 6.07 2 3.65 1.35
4 Taft 21 183.1 212 142 119 96 118 5.79 10 5.84 -
5 Cerro Coso 21 181.2 237 162 137 100 155 7.68 11 6.79 -
5 Sequoias 21 195.0 209 102 79 76 155 7.15 4 3.65 1.46
7 West Hills Coalinga 21 184.2 209 156 113 126 139 6.77 5 5.51 -
8 Porterville 21 179.0 273 210 153 95 88 4.42 9 7.69 -
Rk
1 Merced 21 857 595 224 38 .956 21 8 9 .529 5 -
2 Fresno 21 836 567 246 23 .972 20 20 5 .200 8 -
3 Reedley 21 797 547 215 35 .956 17 4 7 .636 1 -
4 Taft 21 799 550 216 33 .959 16 23 4 .148 6 -
5 Cerro Coso 21 787 544 210 33 .958 15 16 8 .333 3 1
5 Sequoias 21 851 585 234 32 .962 10 11 5 .313 3 -
7 West Hills Coalinga 21 852 554 249 49 .942 23 31 12 .279 12 -
8 Porterville 21 786 527 199 60 .924 7 40 8 .167 15 1
Rk
1 Merced 10 0 0
2 Fresno 10 3,449 345
3 Reedley 10 1,255 126
4 Taft 10 540 54
5 Cerro Coso 11 650 59
5 Sequoias 11 0 0
7 West Hills Coalinga 11 0 0
8 Porterville 11 75 7