2015-16 CVC Team Statistics

Rk
1 Taft 36 1259 203 362 64 11 10 171 115 177 41 22 .288 .367 .380
2 Merced 36 1247 247 351 78 11 16 201 128 188 38 21 .281 .368 .400
3 Reedley 40 1406 252 395 51 9 12 212 195 235 22 15 .281 .381 .356
4 Sequoias 36 1265 188 353 49 7 4 167 134 153 22 16 .279 .364 .338
5 Fresno 38 1334 232 371 65 11 9 196 148 233 48 23 .278 .377 .364
6 West Hills Coalinga 36 1214 181 297 59 11 9 157 129 249 31 18 .245 .335 .334
7 Porterville 36 1177 136 287 60 11 2 119 109 245 16 13 .244 .326 .319
Rk
1 Taft 36 53 18 25 478 85 36 434 294 1.48 1470
2 Merced 36 54 19 32 499 105 31 343 329 1.04 1480
3 Reedley 40 45 21 40 500 72 36 432 346 1.25 1707
4 Sequoias 36 41 12 34 428 60 41 437 317 1.38 1486
5 Fresno 38 75 18 32 485 85 38 385 350 1.10 1607
6 West Hills Coalinga 36 44 15 18 405 79 28 347 305 1.14 1420
7 Porterville 36 41 13 18 375 73 35 365 277 1.32 1358
Rk
1 Taft 36 322.1 369 209 153 122 199 5.56 11 4.27 -
2 Merced 36 319.2 281 198 155 166 244 6.87 10 4.36 1.40
3 Reedley 40 368.2 352 192 150 117 187 4.57 12 3.66 1.27
4 Sequoias 36 325.1 383 231 188 123 186 5.15 13 5.20 1.56
5 Fresno 38 354.1 298 181 125 173 301 7.65 2 3.17 1.33
6 West Hills Coalinga 36 312.0 377 305 240 206 195 5.63 4 6.92 -
7 Porterville 36 314.0 422 264 194 119 154 4.41 11 5.56 -
Rk
1 Taft 36 1457 967 420 70 .952 23 30 12 .286 13 2
2 Merced 36 1459 959 435 65 .955 39 25 20 .444 8 3
3 Reedley 40 1679 1106 507 66 .961 40 30 15 .333 5 -
4 Sequoias 36 1452 976 419 57 .961 35 27 18 .400 6 -
5 Fresno 38 1615 1063 473 79 .951 37 60 17 .221 15 1
6 West Hills Coalinga 36 1407 936 394 77 .945 36 57 18 .240 12 -
7 Porterville 36 1410 936 399 75 .947 29 34 20 .370 10 1
Rk
1 Taft 16 1,295 81
2 Merced 16 0 0
3 Reedley 22 2,618 119
4 Sequoias 20 0 0
5 Fresno 18 6,313 351
6 West Hills Coalinga 19 1,700 89
7 Porterville 21 411 20
Rk
1 Taft 24 828 104 220 36 6 6 90 70 121 18 17 .266 .340 .345
2 Merced 24 821 180 233 57 10 11 152 86 99 23 13 .284 .371 .418
3 Reedley 24 881 167 257 32 5 6 146 118 145 12 10 .292 .391 .360
4 Sequoias 24 847 132 239 29 6 2 120 95 97 16 12 .282 .373 .338
5 Fresno 24 855 171 259 42 8 8 143 107 139 31 17 .303 .406 .399
6 West Hills Coalinga 24 827 127 205 43 8 7 106 92 166 15 11 .248 .340 .345
7 Porterville 24 798 98 195 40 6 2 86 69 182 8 7 .244 .322 .317
Rk
1 Taft 24 28 8 15 286 48 25 299 191 1.57 949
2 Merced 24 35 13 25 343 78 18 258 224 1.15 980
3 Reedley 24 36 15 26 317 43 21 264 218 1.21 1076
4 Sequoias 24 33 8 23 286 37 29 274 230 1.19 1006
5 Fresno 24 50 12 20 341 58 23 238 226 1.05 1044
6 West Hills Coalinga 24 29 10 11 285 58 16 236 204 1.16 969
7 Porterville 24 26 7 9 253 48 23 238 175 1.36 909
Rk
1 Taft 24 217.1 254 149 107 82 139 5.76 8 4.43 -
2 Merced 24 212.0 169 102 81 103 168 7.13 4 3.44 1.28
3 Reedley 24 227.2 210 115 87 67 113 4.47 9 3.44 1.22
4 Sequoias 24 219.1 241 132 105 73 120 4.92 6 4.31 1.43
5 Fresno 24 226.0 187 100 67 101 188 7.49 2 2.67 1.27
6 West Hills Coalinga 24 208.0 246 184 149 124 128 5.54 3 6.45 -
7 Porterville 24 208.0 302 197 145 87 95 4.11 10 6.27 -
Rk
1 Taft 24 977 652 275 50 .949 14 21 6 .222 10 1
2 Merced 24 960 636 294 30 .969 24 10 15 .600 5 2
3 Reedley 24 1040 683 314 43 .959 25 10 8 .444 1 -
4 Sequoias 24 976 658 280 38 .961 25 13 11 .458 4 -
5 Fresno 24 1024 678 298 48 .953 26 23 9 .281 7 1
6 West Hills Coalinga 24 928 624 264 40 .957 23 25 15 .375 9 -
7 Porterville 24 928 618 258 52 .944 18 21 13 .382 7 -
Rk
1 Taft 12 895 75
2 Merced 12 0 0
3 Reedley 12 1,404 117
4 Sequoias 12 0 0
5 Fresno 12 4,403 367
6 West Hills Coalinga 12 1,100 92
7 Porterville 12 73 6